|
2005 NLRC Rules target speedy labor justice
The National Labor Relations Commission's 2005 Revised Rules of Procedure takes effect today or fifteen days after it was published in the Philippine Daily Inquirer and Philippine Star on December 23, 2005.
In line with the commitment to continuously improve its rules of procedure, the NLRC en banc approved the revised rules on September 2, 2005. It was signed by NLRC Chairman Benedicto Ernesto Bitonio Jr., Commissioners Raul Aquino, Lourdes Javier, Gerardo Nograles, Salic Dumarpa, Perlita Velasco, Romeo Go, Victoriano Calaycay, Angelita Gacutan, Romeo Lagman, Tito Genilo, Aurelio Menzon, Oscar Uy, Proculo Sarmen and Jovito Cagaanan.
Chairman Bitonio said that the new rules incorporated existing memorandum circulars such as the guidelines on the appearances of lawyers and non-lawyers, procedures on appeal and posting of surety bonds. It also improved and clarified the rules on execution. It likewise strengthened the rules against prohibited pleadings and motions, including dilatory and frivolous appeals.
Bitonio confirmed that prohibited motions and pleadings will never be allowed, neither shall they be acted upon nor elevated to the Commission by the labor arbiter.
The new rules further outlined the procedure on certified cases and proceedings before the labor arbiters.
An order of reinstatement shall contain a statement that the reinstatement is immediately executory as well as a directive for the employer to submit a report of compliance within ten (10) calendar days from receipt of the decision.
He also said that to attain the mission of the NLRC to resolve labor disputes in the quickest, fairest, least expensive and most effective way possible, no appeal from an interlocutory order shall be entertained. To discourage frivolous or dilatory appeals, including those taken from interlocutory orders, the Commission may censure or cite in contempt the erring parties and their counsels, or subject them to reasonable fine or penalty.
He added that the rules of procedure and evidence prevailing in courts of law and equity shall not be controlling and the Commission shall use every and all reasonable means to ascertain the facts in each case speedily and objectively, without regard to technicalities of law or procedure, all in the interest of due process.
|